Stuart McMillan - Ecommerce Web Development

Life, Internet & the pursuit of Happiness

Profile picture of Stuart McMillan

Hi, I'm Stuart McMillan. I'm an ecommerce professional, the Deputy Head of E-commerce, for the footwear retailer Schuh. Previously I was working for the fashion retailer AllSaints, where I was the E-commerce operations manager. Outside of work, I spend a lot of time reading about web development, usability, process management and any other on-line commerce information I can get hold of. I spend a lot of time outdoors, I'm a keen walker, climber, mountain biker, road cyclist, skier and amateur photographer. This site is a little bit about all that and more.

The day job. I'm responsible for the day to day operation of the ecommerce department, which includes digital marketing, merchandising & editorial. I'm responsible for the performance of the site, both commercially and technically; I also have a project management team reporting to me who look after all the changes we make to all our different sites. Since I joined Schuh in August 2012, this has been one of my first priorities.

My blog posts are not intended to be a 'how-to' guide, the internet already has plenty of resources concerning the subjects I talk about. It is more 'what to do', giving some insight as to the kinds of things I get up to in my day job, however, given my background they may sometimes get a little technical in nature. Hopefully there are some useful insights for any ecommerce professional, I'll try to eliminate the jargon!


Latest Blog Post

Competitor Analysis

I've recently had a look at some Hitwise traffic data for a number of competing retailers. Looking at the graph of the traffic, I wondered if there was any statistical relationship between them; was there any sort of correlation between them? What hypothesis could I form based on that correlation? Here's a sanitised version of the graph. I've added on the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Graph of three competitors traffic, 
				showing the Pearson correlation coefficient for each

For those unfamiliar with Pearson, it is a way of comparing two independent random variables, it has a value ranging from +1 (roughly speaking, when one variable increases, the other always increases) through to -1 (when one variable increases, the other always decreases). 0 indicates no correlation at all.

In this case, you can see that there is a fairly strong correlation between competitors A & B, but a weak correlation between competitors A & C and B & C.

So what does this tell us? Well, I'm not exactly sure to be honest. One theory is that competitors A & B share traffic, and that traffic would tend to visit both competitors or at least have common visit patterns. It would then follow that competitors A & C (which have nearly no correlation) have a completely different traffic profiles, and potentially very different audiences. So, if I were competitor A, should I be trying harder to capture competitor C's traffic, they are an untapped audience?

Another theory is that competitors A & B share similar marketing strategies/calendars and there is a causal relationship between their actions and traffic levels. But then, you wouldn't expect them to be quite so coordinated.

Another interesting idea is that if marketing activities were actually effective then you might expect there to be a strong negative correlation, i.e. one competitor has a negative effect on the other. However, that's not what the data suggests.

Have you got any thoughts on the subject? Please Tweet me, I'd love to hear them!

Tweets by @mcmillanstu